SCCF
Home
Child Abuse & Statistics
Safe Child Custody Fund
The Terror: Child Molester
Pedophile: M.O.
So What's The Difference?
"The Lawyer Test"
Domestic Violence & The Courtroom
Lobbying And Lobbyist
Jack McClellan: Pedophile Advocate
Portrait Of A Specific Pedophile
Animal Rights & Child Protective Measures
Injustice Leaves Lives In Pieces
Congressional Members
Our Team/Our Leanings & A Muckraker
Get To Know Us
Contact Us

Log In
Username

Password





Search Web Pages




The Archivist
×  Named By The Secret Service
×  Follow The Jobs
×  Giuliani Not Good For Health
×  And The (B) Brain Has Left The Building
×  Mr. President: It's You Know Who
×  Whatcha Smokin? (It's Mother T!)
×  Professor: We Are All The Same
×  WHAT'S BIG AS LIFE AND STRONGER THAN MIGHT?
×  Children From The Future
×  Politics in Distractions
×  Bill Moyers' Buying The War
×  Sirota's Book: THE UPRISING
×  Feldman's Book: Outright Barbarous
×  The Three Trillion Dollar War
×  Bunch: Tear Down This Myth
×  Speaking: WOMEN IN A REVOLUTION
×  Student With Heart Condition & No Health Care...
×  You Gotta See This Video!
×  New Book: Souls of My Sisters
×  You Gotta See This Video!
×  You Gotta See This Video!
×  Cavemanmania Stupak et al: 2009
×  So How Come Viagra is Covered???
×  Sick For Profit
×  TO SMACK OR NOT SMACK A DEMOCRAT
×  TO SMACK OR NOT SMACK A REPUBLICAN
×  Polls: Highest Disapproval Ratings
×  Rep. Metcalfe: "a slap in the face to family values"
×  Put a plug in it, Mr. President
×  They keep telling her this, telling her that...
×  White men, don't jump!
×  This Will Hurt Just a Little
×  PA Without Regulation: Common Mold Killing Fungi
×  Say What?!? Say What?!? Say What?!?

News
»  You Gotta See This Video!
»  You Gotta See This Video!
»  You Gotta See This Video!
»  You Gotta See This Video!
»  You Gotta See This Video!
»  Hey, College Kids: You Need To Know...
»  You Don't Write; You Don't Call...

Technically
Poverty
Glossing
Cultural Competence
"Project Farm"
HVCC


LET'S GET SERIOUS
#  Men Against Sexual Violence
#  Domestic Violence is Everybody's Problem
#  Injustice, Judges & Juveniles
#  The PAS Con
#  Does "The System" Support NAMBLA via PAS?
#  PASNAMBLA
#  Say It Ain't So: Governor Proclaims PAS Day?!
#  Running Tally: Lobbyist In The Court
#  PAS DOCTOR
#  PAS Oulives PAS Creator
#  The Truth About Parental Alienation
#  Fathers' Rights & Violence Against Women
#  If You Are Charged With "Junk Science"
#  Child Abuse & Statistics
#  Domestic Violence & The Courtroom
#  So What's The Difference?
#  Get Connected: When You Need It
#  THE CHILD PROTECTORS
#  Poetic Justice
#  The Journey To Enough
#  INTERNATIONAL COMPLAINT FILED


You Say The Darndest Things!
»  Beck throws stones from religious glass house
»  Parallel Stalking & Political Spins
»  I think I was a 5-year-old Muslim b4 Catholic School
»  Dude: Not that Ricky Ricardo
»  Call it Serendipity
»  Jon Stewart Applying the Lingo
»  Sarah Faking Feminism?
»  But Quitters Never Quit!!
»  RANDOM THOUGHTS
»  You say repudiate, she says refudiate
»  CHANGE: Even Archie Bunker did it?
»  Trending: Vogue Economics
»  "You Suck!"
»  Lighter Side Of Poli(ticks)
»  Where r the Titan, Spartan Politicos?
»  Test Your Bias

 

 
 
Pennsylvania's Patriarchial Dominance: Child Custody Court, County-wide

1) Message To Monroe County Court, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania

Is it time to change this yet?

What makes people so afraid of things they don't understand?
If I don't live like you, does that mean I should not appreciate your status as a human being?
What's this deal with homophobia anyway?
Does civil rights belong to everyone?
....even closeted gay Republicans?
Does it have a larger meaning than an individual, group, or societal label?
Should I really care if a gay person loves another gay person?
Would it diminish me as a human being if I say it doesn't matter to me?
Would it be a more comfortable existence for some if I said nothing about this?

Do you know why this is a big deal?

Did you know that animals had rights when children didn't?
Did you know that this kind of disregard for children continues even today?
Did you know that children were considered to be chattel (owned) in this great society?
How familiar are you with the case of the ASPCA attorney and a little girl named Mary Ellen Wilson?


Mary Ellen was severely abused by her parents but there were no laws on the books to protect children. A kind social worker took Mary Ellen's plight to the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA). 10-year-old Mary Ellen had no rights in the court system, it has been reported that the animal lawyer argued that she was "a member of the animal kingdom" so as to direct the court to the abuse she suffered and to her abusers. It was a landmark case that led the way to "some" acknowledgment of child abuse and the necessity to protect children.

How does this relate to civil rights or the rights of citizens, gay or straight?

It seems children, poor people, women, people of color, whites, gays, straight, and wealthy people have a few things in common. Red liquid flows through their veins; they are the same specie (human beings); they have the ability to love freely; they are born with free will; they have a right to be safe and protected from others perfectly willing to inflict harm; they are capable of creating a better society; they have the capacity to think and create beautiful works of art and masterpieces; even the child specie has a goal to learn how to walk, talk, and eventually be an adult specie.

So why stop there?

If a child learns to walk, talk, follow the rules and then becomes a productive adult specie, is it okay to relegate him or her to that "different" status when he or she says, I'm gay?

So I'm wondering why doesn't the specie embrace commonality rather than exploit perceived differences?

Do you think this has something to do with the "crabs in a barrel" philosophy?
Is it better to maintain some folks in the underdog category?
Does this have something to do with a feeling of superiority?
Is this about some fear of masculinity?
Could this be about a mental stranglehold, or more about religiosity?
How much has society changed from the time of ignoring little Mary Ellen's suffering?

As a woman living in a patriarchal system, should it matter to me when a gay person's rights are violated or withheld?

Yes, it turns out that it does matter to me...

The way I see it is heterosexuals can't seem to get the marriage thing right. When the divorce rate is at 52% (and growing), it kind of seems hypocritical to divorce one's self from that reality. Who gets to say which love is better with a heterosexual divorce rate at 52% (and growing)? Seriously??!

I'm just not willing to drink that Kool-Aid. On one hand society says gays can be Rhodes Scholars, scientists, doctors, educators, leaders and politicians, TV and media personalities, journalists, and even Joe The Plumber; but since they happen to be gay, about 50% of their rights need to be taken away?! I'm just not drinking that Kool-Aid!

So I'm speaking out because I'm a woman living in patriarchal society. This kind of dominance is a global reality. In a so-called modern society, we can do better. Seriously!

I'm a woman living in a patriarchal society. I don't have to be gay to understand that reality. I don't have to be a child to understand the ownership/chattel mentality. I just have to respect the "human" in human beings. And I'm strong. I'm strong enough to live and let live.


______________________________________
G. Terri Archer
SCCF
November 22, 2008


2) Pennsylvania Patriarchy - County By County


"The female is a female by virtue of a certain lack of qualities; we should regard the female nature as afflicted with a natural defectiveness"
--Aristotle


"There are, to be sure, other cases in which a certain category has been able to dominate another completely for a time. Very often this privilege depends upon inequality of numbers--the majority imposes its rule upon the minority or persecutes it. But women are not a minority"
--Simone de Beauvoir

"DELIVERANCE: A CHILDREN'S STORY"

By The SCCF Team

Deliver us from evil



You drag me through a PATRIARCHAL court system
without concern that never listens

DELIVER US FROM EVIL


Deliver us from evil 5


Your ARMY of PATRIARCHY dominates the love trying to protect me

DELIVER US FROM EVIL



Deliver us from evil 2


You hide corruption in plain sight, but nobody checks up on you

DELIVER US FROM EVIL



Deliver us from evil 3


I will not engage in your sexist blame game;
I will even refrain from blaming the one who harms me,
for without your enabling practice of pseudo justice,
I would not be sacrificial casualty

DELIVER US FROM EVIL

Deliver us from evil 6


No man is an island
You reign as HAMAN but the TRUTH is QUEEN ESTHER

DELIVER US FROM EVIL


Deliver us from evil 4


You are old
and I will outlive you

DELIVER US FROM EVIL




3) Patriarchy & The "I" Have A Place

Just Ask The Dinosaurs

George Herbert Mead

By Pam Ely


George Herbert Mead was an American philosopher, sociologist and psychologist. He had a major desire to help others in society. He worked as a community organizer in Chicago.

As a graduate student at Harvard University, he accepted part-time work to support himself. He studied philosophy but thought it too abstract and isolated from the real world. He decided to study physiological psychology; he believed this method would afford him a more practical and scientific understanding.

Mead was a pragmatist and one of the founders of social psychology; as well, he was a distinguished affiliate of the University of Chicago.

He believed social change can be a reality when the self acts as a product of the community. Mead’s community involvement served to influence his beliefs that the self is secondary to society. When one is socialized to believe in the greater good of community, social problems can be addressed in a more productive manner.


Mead on Symbolic Interaction:

In everyday life, people tend to take an individualist or psychological view of the causes of social behavior. Think of your close family members or best friends. According to an individualist view, each brings a unique personality and individual set of behaviors to the family or friendship group, and the individual traits of each member combine with those of other members to create a group. Although part of a family or group, we still think of ourselves as separate from the other people that belong to it, distinguishing our own traits, selves and beliefs from the groups and social world around us.

At the extreme, this kind of thinking--this sense of separation from others, groups and the larger community--contributes to selfishness: each person should worry about his or her own problems, and let others worry about their own problems. People sometimes seem excessively concerned about their own ambitions, possessions, and self-esteem, seeing others as competitors or obstructions to their own goals. Individualism can thus lessen the attention we give to the social community and its needs
(Pampel 169).

Mead’s philosophy entailed the beliefs that humans are different than animals because they are able to self evaluate.

Unlike other animals, humans have the ability to to see themselves as objects. In a sense, people can step outside their bodies and view themselves as something separate. People tell themselves--as if talking to another person--that they behaved stupidly after making a mistake or that they behaved impressively after doing something well. We refer to our self in these one-person conversations as more than our body; it includes the whole of our behavior, thoughts, feelings, accomplishments, failures, and general sense of well-being when viewed from the outside (Pampel 195).

Specifically, Mead believed the self to be more aligned with social groups than some would otherwise believe. We judge ourselves based on our interaction with others. It is a consequence of human interactions for most people.

Mead described the symbolic gestures as a complex system of symbols that generates response from one human to another. A smile could cause another to smile, or maybe not, depending on an individual's perspective/experience.

Mead’s concept of “I” and “me” was central to social philosophy and one of the greatest influences on sociology--termed, symbolic-interactionism. He described “I” and “me” as socially intertwined in social interactions. “I” is the object of self and “me” is the reflection of self via interaction with others.


Mead on Vice, Corruption, and Violence:

Problems of vice appeared in the widespread and open practice of prostitution in certain parts of the city. One reporter visiting from London wrote, "Chicago makes a more amazingly open display of evil than any other city known to me" (Miller 1996:508). In one section, called Hell's Half Acre, almost every building was a saloon, bordello, or dice parlor. Many young single women who came to Chicago from rural areas and small towns to look for work and a more exciting life found that selling sex was not illegal and was viewed by many as a necessary evil. Not until 1900 did reformers mount a campaign to outlaw prostitution.

In politics, a spoils system developed, whereby the victorious mayor and members of the city council would reward supporters with government jobs. Owing their job to politicians, government employees worked harder for their candidates than for the community as a whole. They ignored conditions of the slums and factory sweatshops but would take bribes to help local businessmen and to further improve the already impressive downtown.

Given this corruption, election day always brought excitement to the city. With about half of the city's polling places in saloons, men could win free drinks with their vote. Both Republicans and Democrats rounded up drifters, drunks, and flophouse residents, then gave them lists of false names and addresses to use while voting throughout the city. the next day they paid them 50 cents for each vote. with many residents voting early and often, it was not unusual to find ballots from George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and Abraham Lincoln. Further, gangs representing each party would threaten opposition voters with violence; riots, stabbings, shootings, and fights occurred often, with one politician saying that "you had to have a fist like a ham in those days" (Miller 1996:467).

Conflict and struggle also existed between employers and a small but growing labor movement, and in 1886 the nation's most violent confrontation between workers and the police occurred in Chicago. During a strike for an eight-hour day, a scuffle between strikers and replacement workers in one Chicago factory led to the shooting deaths of two strikers by police. Labor leaders called for a demonstration the next day at Haymarket Square, where, during a confrontation between police and about 2,500 demonstrators, a bomb exploded in the front ranks of the police. The police began firing, and some demonstrators returned fire. A few minutes of wild carnage ended with 7 policemen killed and 60 injured; probably about the same number of casualties occurred among the demonstrators.

Although they could not identify or catch the bomb-thrower, police and prosecutors, supported by vengeful citizens, arrested eight leaders of the Chicago anarchist movement, who were convicted by a jury and judge already convinced of their guilt before the trial began. Four were hung, one committed suicide, and three went to prison. Both the killing of the police and the disgraceful trial generated debate and divisions throughout the country. One historian wrote, "the Haymarket tragedy was the central symbolic event for [a] generation of reformers ... convincing them that class division threatened the very fabric of the American republic" (Miller 1996:481). Even Friedrich Engels, following the events from England, wrote, "I only wish Marx could have lived to see it! The breaking out of class war in America" (Miller 1996:481).

These problems, exemplified in Chicago but also existing in other U.S. cities, conflicted with the American values of equality and democracy. It led in the late 1800s to the early 1900s to a desire to solve the problems of American life. A new generation of reformers accepted America's traditional goals but rejected the traditional religious and conservative means of reaching them. Both sociology as a field of study and Mead as a social theorist would emerge from this environment of social reform and idealism
(Pampel 178-179).

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The preceding part of Pampel's work seemed more a necessity in its totality.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The most important work on the self in symbolic interactionism is Presentation of Self in Everyday Life by Erving Goffman. Goffman's conception of the self is deeply indebted to Mead's ideas, in particular his discussion of the tension between I, the spontaneous self, and me, social constraints within the self (Ritzer 136).

To Goffman (and to most other symbolic interactionists), the self is not a possession of the actor but rather the product of the dramatic interaction between actor and audience. In other words, the self is a sense of who one is that is a dramatic effect emerging from the immediate scene being presented. Because the self is a product of dramatic interaction, it is vulnerable to disruption during the performance (Ritzer 137).


Glossary:

Dramaturgy: A view of social life as a series of dramatic performances akin to those that take place in the theater (Pampel).

Front stage: That part of dramaturgical performance that generally functions in rather fixed and general ways to define the situation for those who observe the performance (Pampel).

Patriarchy: A system in which men subjugate women. It is universal, pervasive in its social organization, durable over time and space, and triumphantly maintained in the face of occasional challenge (Ritzer).

Gender Oppression: Describes women's situation as the consequence of a direct power relationship between men and women in which men have fundamental and concrete interests in controlling, using, subjugating, and oppressing women: that is, in the practice of domination.

Domination: Any relationship in which one party (individual or collective), the dominant, succeeds in making the other party (individual or collective) the subordinate, an instrument of the dominant's will, and refuses to recognize the subordinate's independent subjectivity.

Structural Oppression: (like gender oppression) Recognizes that oppression results from the fact that some groups of people derive direct benefits from controlling, using, subjugating, and oppressing other groups of people. Structural oppression studies how those interests in domination are enacted through mechanisms of social structure, that is, through recurring and routinized large-scale arrangements of social interaction. These arrangements are always arrangements of power that have arisen historically, that is, over time. Structural oppression examines the structures of patriarchy, capitalism, racism, and heterosexism; and it locate enactments of domination and experiences of oppression in the interplay of these structures, that is, in the way they mutually enforce each other.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Wow! That Goffman was wicked! That's slang for reality.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

George Herbert Mead was the architect of the theory of "I" and "me." But other theorists, such as Erving Goffman, greatly contributed to the human understanding of self. For moi, it wasn't that hard to delve in to these concepts and ideas. I am both a member of this and that and surrounded by them--the I.s.

I gather, from these illustrious thinkers, that there are primarily two types of people. Freudian theorists may also find some conclusions in Mead and Goffman's theories as they relate to children. In early childhood, one would accept the "I" in the behavior of children. Their human interaction and development are classified as being in the beginning (elementary) stages.

But there is no doubt that the "I" stage embodies a certain adult segment of society that wallows in the selfish, subjective, and control freak stage.

Some people graduate to the community stage. They see themselves as reflections of the people they try to assist. They have a need to feel like they are a part of something greater than themselves.

Whichever your status, it is clear there continues a struggle for a calmer, fair, and more just society. When others rally the stagnancy of patriarchy--a segment of the I.s--there will always be those rallying the graduates of self to a greater cause and objectivity.

The wisdom of nature tells us nothing stays the same forever. Just as the dinosaurs, patriarchy and the rest of the I.s will have a place forever in our museums.


______________________________
Pam Ely
SCCF Member
November 29, 2008


Works Cited


Pampel, C., Fred. Sociological Lives and Ideas: An Introduction to the Classical Theorists. 2nd Edition. New York: Worth Publishers, 2007.


Ritzer, G. Contemporary Sociological Theory and Its Classical Roots - The Basics. 2nd Edition. New York: McGraw Hill, 2007.




4) Women In History And What They Accomplished

Trailblazing Women

1) Harriet Tubman
2) Jane Addams
3) Simone de Beauvoir
4) Ida B. Wells-Barnett
5) Sojourner Truth
6) Susan B. Anthony
7) Rosa Parks
8) Clara Barton
9) Toni Morrison
10) Mary McLeod Bethune
11) Maya Angelou
12) Jeanette Rankin
13) Elizabeth Cady Stanton
14) Alice Walker
15) Margaret Mead
16) Alice Paul
17) Babe Didrikson
18) Maria Mitchell
19) Lucretia Mott
20) Phyllis Schlafly
21) Lucy Stone
22) Rosie the Riveter
23) Rose Schneiderman
24) Charlotte Perkins Gilman
25) Marie Curie
26) Margaret Sanger
27) Amelia Earhart


**************************************************************


What They Accomplished

19) She was a Quaker minister, abolitionist, and women's rights advocate. She helped plan the Women's Rights Conference at Seneca Falls in 1848.

5) She was born in 1797 on the Colonel Johannes Hardenbergh estate in Swartekill, in Ulster County, a Dutch settlement in upstate New York. Her given name was Isabella Baumfree (also spelled Bomefree). She was one of 13 children born to Elizabeth and James Baumfree, also slaves on the Hardenbergh plantation. She spoke only Dutch until she was sold from her family around the age of nine. Because of the cruel treatment she suffered at the hands of a later master, she learned to speak English quickly, but had a Dutch accent for the rest of her life.

She was first sold around age 9 when her second master (Charles Hardenbergh) died in 1808. She was sold to John Neely, along with a herd of sheep, for $100. Neely's wife and family only spoke English and beat Isabella fiercely for the frequent miscommunications. She later said that Neely once whipped her with "a bundle of rods, prepared in the embers, and bound together with cords." It was during this time that she began to find refuge in religion -- beginning the habit of praying aloud when scared or hurt.

But a year and a half later, in 1810, she was sold again to John Dumont of New Paltz, New York. Isabella suffered many hardships at the hands of Mrs. Dumont, whom Isabella later described as cruel and harsh. Although she did not explain the reasons for this treatment in her later biography narrative, historians have surmised that the unspeakable things might have been sexual abuse or harassment (see the biography on Harriet Jacobs, the only former slave to write about such), or simply the daily humiliations that slaves endured.

Sometime around 1815, she fell in love with a fellow slave named Robert, who was owned by a man named Catlin or Catton. Robert's owner forbade the relationship because he did not want his slave having children with a slave he did not own (and therefore would not own the new 'property'). One night Robert visited Isabella, but was followed by his owner and son, who beat him savagely ("bruising and mangling his head and face"), bound him and dragged him away. Robert never returned. Isabella had a daughter shortly thereafter, named Diana. In 1817, forced to submit to the will of her owner Dumont, Isabella married an older slave named Thomas. They had four children: Peter (1822), James (who died young), Elizabeth (1825), and Sophia (1826).

The state of New York began in 1799 to legislate the gradual abolition of slaves, which was to happen July 4, 1827. Dumont had promised Isabella freedom a year before the state emancipation, "if she would do well and be faithful." However, he reneged on his promise, claiming a hand injury had made her less productive. She was infuriated, having understood fairness and duty as a hallmark of the master-slave relationship. She continued working until she felt she had done enough to satisfy her sense of obligation to him -- spinning 100 pounds of wool -- then escaped before dawn with her infant daughter, Sophia. She later said:


"I did not run off, for I thought that wicked, but I walked off, believing that to be all right."


Isabella wandered, not sure where she was going, and prayed for direction. She arrived at the home of Isaac and Maria Van Wagenen (Wagener?). Soon after, Dumont arrived, insisting she come back and threatening to take her baby when she refused. Isaac offered to buy her services for the remainder of the year (until the state's emancipation took effect), which Dumont accepted for $20. Isaac and Maria insisted Isabella not call them "master" and "mistress," but rather by their given names.

Isabella immediately set to work retrieving her young son Peter. He had recently been leased by Dumont to another slaveholder, who then illegally sold Peter to an owner in Alabama. Peter was five years old. First she appealed to the Dumonts, then the other slaveholder, to no avail. A friend directed her to activist Quakers, who helped her make an official complaint in court. After months of legal proceedings, Peter returned to her, scarred and abused.

During her time with the Van Wagenens, Isabella had a life-changing religious experience -- becoming "overwhelmed with the greatness of the Divine presence" and inspired to preach. She began devotedly attending the local Methodist church and, in 1829, left Ulster County with a white evangelical teacher named Miss Gear. She quickly became known as a remarkable preacher whose influence "was miraculous." She soon met Elijah Pierson, a religious reformer who advocated strict adherence to Old Testament laws for salvation. His house was sometimes called the "Kingdom," where he led a small group of followers. Isabella became the group's housekeeper. Elijah treated her as a spiritual equal and encouraged her to preach also. Soon after, Robert Matthias arrived, who apparently took over as the group's leader, with the activities becoming increasingly bizarre. In 1834, Pierson died with only the group's members attending. His family called the coroner and the group disbanded. The Folger family, whose house the group had moved into, accused Robert and Isabella of stealing their money and poisoning Elijah. They were eventually acquitted and Robert traveled west.

Isabella settled in New York City, but she had lost what savings and possessions she had had. She resolved to leave and make her way as a traveling preacher. On June 1, 1843, she changed her name to Sojourner Truth and told friends, "The Spirit calls me [East], and I must go." She wandered in relative obscurity, depending on the kindness of strangers. In 1844, still liking the utopian cooperative ideal, she joined the Northampton Association of Education and Industry in Massachusetts. This group of 210 members lived on 500 acres of farmland, raising livestock, running grist and saw mills, and operating a silk factory. Unlike the Kingdom, the Association was founded by abolitionists to promote cooperative and productive labor. They were strongly anti-slavery, religiously tolerant, women's rights supporters, and pacifist in principles. While there, she met and worked with abolitionists such as William Lloyd Garrison, Frederick Douglass, and David Ruggles. Unfortunately, the community's silk-making was not profitable enough to support itself and it disbanded in 1846 amid debt.

She went to live with one of the Association's founders, George Benson, who had established a cotton mill. Shortly thereafter, she began dictating her memoirs to Olive Gilbert, another Association member. The Narrative of Sojourner Truth: A Northern Slave was published privately by William Lloyd Garrison in 1850. It gave her an income and increased her speaking engagements, where she sold copies of the book. She spoke about anti-slavery and women's rights, often giving personal testimony about her experiences as a slave. That same year, 1850, Benson's cotton mill failed and he left Northampton. Sojourner bought a home there for $300. In 1854, at the Ohio Woman's Rights Covention in Akron, Ohio, she gave her most famous speech -- with the legendary phrase,


"Ain't I a Woman?":
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


"That man over there says that women need to be helped into carriages, and lifted over ditches, and to have the best place everywhere. Nobody ever helps me into carriages, or over mud puddles, or gives me any best place, and ain't I a woman? ... I have plowed, and planted, and gathered into barns, and no man could head me -- and ain't I a woman? I could work as much and eat as much as a man (when I could get it), and bear the lash as well -- and ain't I a woman? I have borne thirteen children and seen most all sold off to slavery and when I cried out with my mother's grief, none but Jesus heard me -- and ain't I woman?"


She later became involved with the popular Spiritualism religious movement of the time, through a group called the Progressive Friends, an offshoot of the Quakers. The group believed in abolition, women's rights, non-violence, and communicating with spirits. In 1857, she sold her home in Northampton and bought one in Harmonia, Michigan (just west of Battle Creek), to live with this community. In 1858, at a meeting in Silver Lake, Indiana, someone in the audience accused her of being a man (she was very tall, towering around six feet) so she opened her blouse to reveal her breasts.

During the Civil War, she spoke on the Union's behalf, as well as for enlisting black troops for the cause and freeing slaves. Her grandson James Caldwell enlisted in the 54th Regiment, Massachusetts. In 1864, she worked among freed slaves at a government refugee camp on an island in Virginia and was employed by the National Freedman's Relief Association in Washington, D.C. She also met President Abraham Lincoln in October. (A famous painting, and subsequent photographs of it, depict President Lincoln showing Sojourner the 'Lincoln Bible,' given to him by the black people of Baltimore, Maryland.) In 1863, Harriet Beecher Stowe's article "The Libyan Sibyl" appeared in the Atlantic Monthly; a romanticized description of Sojourner. (The previous year, William Story's statue of the same title, inspired by the article, won an award at the London World Exhibition.) After the Civil War ended, she continued working to help the newly freed slaves through the Freedman's Relief Association, then the Freedman's Hospital in Washington. In 1867, she moved from Harmonia to Battle Creek, converting William Merritt's "barn" into a house, for which he gave her the deed four years later.

In 1870, she began campaigning for the federal government to provide former slaves with land in the "new West." She pursued this for seven years, with little success. In 1874, after touring with her grandson Sammy Banks, he fell ill and she developed ulcers on her leg. Sammy died after an operation. She was successfully treated by Dr. Orville Guiteau, veterinarian, and headed off on speaking tours again, but had to return home due to illness once more. She did continue touring as much as she could, still campaigning for free land for former slaves. In 1879, she was delighted as many freed slaves began migrating west and north on their own, many settling in Kansas. She spent a year there helping refugees and speaking in white and black churches trying to gain support for the "Exodusters" as they tried to build new lives for themselves. This was to be her last mission.

10) She was the first black woman to head a federal agency (Negro Affairs for the National Youth Administration) (1875-1955).

16) She was the Founder of the National Women's Party and author of the Equal Rights Amendment (1885-1977).

1) She was born 1820 in Dorchester County, Maryland. She was a runaway slave who became known as the "Moses of her people." Over the course of 10 years, and at great personal risk, she led hundreds of slaves to freedom along the Underground Railroad, a secret network of safe houses where runaway slaves could stay on their journey north to freedom. She later became a leader in the abolitionist movement, and during the Civil War she was a spy for the federal forces in South Carolina as well as a nurse (1820-1913).

13) She was refused admission to the 1840 World Anti-slavery Convention in London. Unable to participate in the convention, she, along with a handful of other women, worked to organize the Women's Rights Convention held in Seneca Falls, New York in 1848.

9) She won the 1993 Nobel Prize for Literature. She is the author of Beloved.

12) She was the first woman to hold a seat in Congress. Her political career grew out of her work for women's suffrage. She served in Congress twice and has the unique distinction of having cast the sole voted against both World Wars (1880-1973).

6) She worked tirelessly for women's suffrage for more than fifty years. She crossed the country repeatedly, lecturing, organizing and raising money for the cause. She published Revolution, a women's rights journal and supported labor issues (1820-1906).

15) She was an anthropologist and author who spoke about gender and sex roles (1901-1978).

22) She was the nickname for women workers in World War II. Women performed industrial and defense jobs of all types during the war, only to be sent back home when the war was over.

25) She was the winner of two Nobel Prizes for her discoveries in physics and chemistry (1867-1934).

21) She was a nineteenth century abolitionist and women's rights activist. She retained her name when she married Henry B. Blackwell in 1855 (1818-1893).

24) She was a nineteenth century feminist thinker. As author and lecturer, she called for day care and communal dining arrangements, calling the contemporary American home an "archaic vestige of preindustrial society."

18) She was knowledgeable in astronomy. She discovered a comet in 1847. She was a teacher at Vassar College and trained other young female scientists (1818-1889).

14) She is a novelist, essayist, poet, short-story writer, and leader of the women's movement. She won the Pulitzer Prize for Literature in 1983 for her book, The Color Purple.

26) She wrote the book,Women and the New Race. She coined the term "birth control" and opened the first birth control clinic in the United States in 1916. She later imported the first diaphragms from Japan.

3) She was a French existentialist philosopher. She wrote the book, The Second Sex, an encyclopedic survey of womanhood that is considered one of the greatest writings of the 20th century. The Second Sex remains, to this day, a central text in the investigation of women's oppression.

In Woman as Other, she challenged Aristotle's theory on a woman's body as a hindrance, a prison, weighed down by everything peculiar to it:

"The female is a female by virtue of a certain lack of qualities; we should regard the female nature as afflicted with a natural defectiveness"
-Aristotle


"Thus humanity is male and man defines woman not in herself but as relative to him; she is not regarded as an autonomous being. Man can think of himself without woman. She cannot think of herself without man. And she is simply what man decrees; thus she is called 'the sex,' by which is meant that she appears essentially to the male as a sexual being. For him she is sex--absolute sex, no less. She is defined and differentiated with reference to man and not he with reference to her; she is the incidental, the inessential as opposed to the essential. He is the subject, he is the absolute--she is the Other.

The category of the Other is as primordial as consciousness itself. In the most primitive societies, in the most ancient mythologies, one finds the expression of a duality--that of the Self and the Other. This duality was not originally attached to the division of the sexes; it was not dependent upon any empirical facts. It is revealed in such works as the Granet on Chinese thought and those of Dumezil on the East Indies and Rome.....

Thus it is that no group ever sets itself up as the One without at once setting up the Other over against itself. If three travelers chance to occupy the same compartment, that is enough to make vaguely hostile "other" out of all the rest of the passengers on the train. In small-town eyes all persons not belonging to the village are "strangers" and suspect; to the native of a country all who inhabit other countries are "foreigners,"' Jews are "different" for the anti-Semite, Negroes are "inferior" for American racists, aborigines are "natives" for colonists, proletarians are the "lower class" for the privileged.

....

No subject will readily volunteer to become the object, the inessential; it is not the Other who, in defining himself as the Other, establishes the One. The Other is posed as such by the One in defining himself as the One. But if the Other is not to regain the status of being the One, he must be submissive enough to accept this alien point of view. Whence comes this submission in the case of woman?

There are, to be sure, other cases in which a certain category has been able to dominate another completely for a time. Very often this privilege depends upon inequality of numbers--the majority imposes its rule upon the minority or persecutes it. But women are not a minority, like the American Negroes or the Jews; there are as many women as men on earth. Again, the two groups concerned have often been originally independent; they may have been formerly unaware of each other's existence, or perhaps they recognized each other's autonomy. But a historical event has resulted in the subjugation of the weaker by the stronger. The scattering of Jews, the introduction of slavery into America, the conquests of imperialism are examples in point. In these cases the oppressed retained at least the memory of former days; they possessed in common a past, a tradition, sometimes a religion or a culture.

The parallel drawn by Bebel between women and the proletariat is valid in that neither ever formed a minority or a separate collective unit of mankind. And instead of a single historical even it is in both cases a historical development that explains their status as a class and accounts for the membership of particular individuals in their class. But proletarians have not always existed, whereas there have always been women. They are women in virtue of their anatomy and physiology. Throughout history they have always been subordinated to men, and hence their dependency is not the result of a historical event or a social change--it was not something that occurred. The reason why otherness in this case seems to be an absolute is in part that it lacks the contingent or incidental nature of historical facts. A condition brought about at a certain time can be abolished at some other time, as the Negroes of Haiti and others have proved; but it might seem that a natural condition is beyond the possibility of change. ....but the women's effort has never been anything more than a symbolic agitation. They have gained only what men have been willing to grant; they have taken nothing, they have only received.

The reason for this is that women lack concrete means for organizing themselves into a unit which can stand face to face with the correlative unit. They have no past, no history, no religion of their own; and they have no such solidarity of work and interest as that of the proletariat. ....They live dispersed among the males, attached through residence, housework, economic conditions, and social standing to certain men--fathers or husbands--more firmly than they are to other women. If they belong to the bourgeoisie, they feel solidarity with men of that class, not with proletarian women; if they are white, their allegiance is to white men, not to Negro women. The proletariat can propose to massacre the ruling class, and a sufficiently fanatical Jew or Negro might dream of getting sole possession of the atomic bomb and making humanity wholly Jewish or black; but woman cannot even dream of exterminating the males. The bond that unites her to her oppressors is not comparable to any other. The division of the sexes is a biological fact, not an event in human history. Male and female stand opposed within a primordial Mitsein, and woman has not broken it. The couple is a fundamental unity with its two halves riveted together, and the cleavage of society along the line of sex is impossible. Here is to be found the basic trait of woman: she is the Other in a totality of which the two components and necessary to one another.

One could suppose that this reciprocity might have facilitated the liberation of woman. .....In truth woman has not been socially emancipated through man's needs--sexual desire and the desire for offspring--which makes the male dependent for satisfaction upon the female.

Master and slave, also, are united by a reciprocal need, in this case economic, which does not liberate the slave. In the relation of master to slave the master does not make a point of the need that he has for the other; he has in his grasp the power of satisfying this need through his own action; whereas the slave, in his dependent condition, his hope and fear, is quite conscious of the need he has for his master. Even if the need is at bottom equally urgent for both, it always works in favor of the oppressor and against the oppressed. That is why the liberation of the working class, for example has been slow.

Now, woman has always been man's dependent, if not his slave; the two sexes have never shared the world in equality. And even today woman is heavily handicapped, though her situation is beginning to change. Almost nowhere is her legal status the same as man's, and frequently it is much to her disadvantage. Even when her rights are legally recognized in the abstract, long standing custom prevents their full expression in the mores. In the economic sphere men and women can almost be said to make up two castes; other things being equal, the former hold the better jobs, get higher wages, and have more opportunity for success than their new competitors. In industry and politics men have a great many more positions and they monopolize the most important posts. In addition to all this, they enjoy a traditional prestige that the education of children tends in every way to support, for the present enshrines the past--and in the past all history has been made by men. At the present time, when women are beginning to take part in the affairs of the world, it is still a work that belongs to men--they have no doubt of it at all and women have scarcely any. to decline to be the Other, to refuse to be a party to the deal--this would be for women to renounce all the advantages conferred upon them by their alliance with the superior caste. Man-the-sovereign will provide women-the-liege with material protection and will undertake the moral justification of her existence; thus she can evade at once both economic risk and the metaphysical risk of a liberty in which ends and aims must be contrived without assistance. Indeed, along with the ethical urge of each individual to affirm his subjective existence, there is also the temptation to forgo liberty and become a thing. This is an inauspicious road, for he who takes it--passive, lost, ruined--becomes henceforth the creature of another's will, frustrated in his transcendence and deprived of every value. But it is an easy road; on it one avoids the strain involved in undertaking an authentic existence. When man makes a woman the Other, he may, then, expect her to manifest deep-seated tendencies toward complicity. Thus, woman may fail to lay claim to the status of subject because she lacks definite resources, because she feels the necessary bond that ties her to man regardless of reciprocity, and because she is often very well pleased with her role as the Other."
-Simone de Beauvoir (Legacies 766-771).

23) She organized the first union of the United Cloth, Hat, and Cap Makers Union. She was President of the Women's Trade Union League throughout the twenties and ran for the United States Senate on the Labor Party ticket in 1920.

11) She was born Marguerite Johnson in St. Louis, Missouri. She grew up in St. Louis and Stamps, Arkansas. She is an author, poet, historian, songwriter, playwright, dancer, stage and screen producer, director, performer, singer, and civil rights activist. She is best known for her autobiographical books: All God's Children Need Traveling Shoes (1986), The Heart of a Woman (1981), Singin' and Swingin' and Gettin' Merry Like Christmas (1976), Gather Together in My Name (1974), and I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings (1969), which was nominated for the National Book Award.

Among her volumes of poetry are A Brave and Startling Truth (Random House, 1995), The Complete Collected Poems of Maya Angelou (1994), Wouldn't Take Nothing for My Journey Now (1993), Now Sheba Sings the Song (1987), I Shall Not Be Moved (1990), Shaker, Why Don't You Sing? (1983), Oh Pray My Wings Are Gonna Fit Me Well (1975), and Just Give Me a Cool Drink of Water 'fore I Diiie (1971), which was nominated for the Pulitzer Prize.

In 1959, at the request of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., she became the northern coordinator for the Southern Christian Leadership Conference....

The first black woman director in Hollywood, she has written, produced, directed, and starred in productions for stage, film, and television. In 1971, she wrote the original screenplay and musical score for the film Georgia, Georgia, and was both author and executive producer of a five-part television miniseries "Three Way Choice." She has also written and produced several prize-winning documentaries, including, "Afro-Americans in the Arts," a PBS special for which she received the Golden Eagle Award. Maya Angelou was twice nominated for a Tony award for acting: once for her Broadway debut in Look Away (1973), and again for her performance in Roots (1977).

20) She is an anti-feminist leader who helped defeat the ERA.

2) She won worldwide recognition in the first third of the twentieth century as a pioneer social worker in America, as a feminist, and as an internationalist. She began Hull House, a settlement in the slums of Chicago. She made reports on neighborhood conditions to promote better housing, sewage, schools, and roads.

She was born in Cedarville, Illinois, the eighth of nine children. Her father was a prosperous miller and local political leader who served for sixteen years as a state senator and fought as an officer in the Civil War; he was a friend of Abraham Lincoln whose letters to him began «My Dear Double D-'ed Addams». Because of a congenital spinal defect, Jane was not physically vigorous when young nor truly robust even later in life, but her spinal difficulty was remedied by surgery.

In 1881 she graduated from the Rockford Female Seminary, the valedictorian of a class of seventeen, but was granted the bachelor's degree only after the school became accredited the next year as Rockford College for Women....

She was an ardent feminist by philosophy. In those days before women's suffrage she believed that women should make their voices heard in legislation and therefore should have the right to vote, but more comprehensively, she thought that women should generate aspirations and search out opportunities to realize them.

For her own aspiration to rid the world of war, she created opportunities or seized those offered to her to advance the cause. In 1906 she gave a course of lectures at the University of Wisconsin summer session which she published the next year as a book, Newer Ideals of Peace. She spoke for peace in 1913 at a ceremony commemorating the building of the Peace Palace at The Hague and in the next two years, as a lecturer sponsored by the Carnegie Foundation, spoke against America's entry into the First World War. In January, 1915, she accepted the chairmanship of the Women's Peace Party, an American organization, and four months later the presidency of the International Congress of Women convened at The Hague largely upon the initiative of Dr. Aletta Jacobs, a Dutch suffragist leader of many and varied talents. When this congress later founded the organization called the Women's International League for Peace and Freedom, Jane Addams served as president until 1929, as presiding officer of its six international conferences in those years, and as honorary president for the remainder of her life.

Publicly opposed to America's entry into the war, she was attacked in the press and expelled from the Daughters of the American Revolution, but she found an outlet for her humanitarian impulses as an assistant to Herbert Hoover in providing relief supplies of food to the women and children of the enemy nations, the story of which she told in her book Peace and Bread in Time of War (1922).

After sustaining a heart attack in 1926, she never fully regained her health. Indeed, she was being admitted to a Baltimore hospital on the very day, December 10, 1931, that the Nobel Peace Prize was being awarded to her in Oslo. She died in 1935 three days after an operation revealed unsuspected cancer. The funeral service was held in the courtyard of Hull-House (1860-1935).

8) She established a clearinghouse for food, clothing, blankets, money, and medical care during the Civil War. She is most well known for establishing the Red Cross (1821-1912).

4) She was a fearless anti-lynching crusader, suffragist, women's rights advocate, journalist, and speaker. She stands as one of our nation's most uncompromising leaders and most ardent defenders of democracy. She was born in Holly Springs, Mississippi in 1862 and died in Chicago, Illinois 1931 at the age of sixty-nine.

It was in Memphis where she first began to fight (literally) for racial and gender justice. In 1884 she was asked by the conductor of the Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad Company to give up her seat on the train to a white man and ordered her into the smoking or "Jim Crow" car, which was already crowded with other passengers. Despite the 1875 Civil Rights Act banning discrimination on the basis of race, creed, or color, in theaters, hotels, transports, and other public accommodations, several railroad companies defied this congressional mandate and racially segregated its passengers. It is important to realize that her defiant act was before Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), the U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the fallacious doctrine of "separate but equal," which constitutionalized racial segregation.

Many people took the advice she penned in her paper and left town; other members of the Black community organized a boycott of white owned business to try to stem the terror of lynchings. Her newspaper office was destroyed as a result of the muckraking and investigative journalism she pursued after the killing of her three friends. She could not return to Memphis, so she moved to Chicago. She however continued her blistering journalistic attacks on Southern injustices, being especially active in investigating and exposing the fraudulent "reasons" given to lynch Black men, which by now had become a common occurrence.

In Chicago, she helped develop numerous African American women and reform organizations, but she remained diligent in her anti-lynching crusade, writing Southern Horrors: Lynch Law in All Its Phases. She also became a tireless worker for women's suffrage, and happened to march in the famous 1913 march for universal suffrage in Washington, D.C. Not able to tolerate injustice of any kind, Ida B. Wells-Barnett, along with Jane Addams, successfully blocked the establishment of segregated schools in Chicago.

In 1895 she married the editor of one of Chicago's early Black newspapers. She wrote: "I was married in the city of Chicago to Attorney F. L. Barnett, and retired to what I thought was the privacy of a home." She did not stay retired long and continued writing and organizing. In 1906, she joined with William E.B. DuBois and others to further the Niagara Movement, and she was one of two African American women to sign "the call" to form the NAACP in 1909. Although she was one of the founding members of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), she was also among the few Black leaders to explicitly oppose Booker T. Washington and his strategies. As a result, she was viewed as one the most radical of the so-called "radicals" who organized the NAACP and marginalized from positions within its leadership. As late as 1930, she became disgusted by the nominees of the major parties to the state legislature, so she decided to run for the Illinois State legislature, which made her one of the first Black women to run for public office in the United States. A year later, she passed away after a lifetime crusading for justice.

7) She refused to give up her seat on the bus, which resulted in one of the earliest United States Civil Rights demonstrations, the Montgomery Bus Boycott. Most historians date the beginning of the modern civil rights movement in the United States to December 1, 1955. That was the day when an unknown seamstress in Montgomery, Alabama refused to give up her bus seat to a white passenger. She was arrested and fined for violating a city ordinance, but her lonely act of defiance began a movement that ended legal segregation in America, and made her an inspiration to people everywhere (1913-2005).

17) She was a multi-talented Olympic athlete who won more medals than any other athlete of her era, male or female (1914-1956).

27) She was born on July 24, 1897. She was a noted American aviation pioneer, and author. She was the first woman to receive the Distinguished Flying Cross, which she was awarded as the first aviatrix to fly solo across the Atlantic Ocean. She set many other records, wrote best-selling books about her flying experiences, and was instrumental in the formation of The Ninety-Nines, an organization for female pilots.

During an attempt to make a circumnavigational flight of the globe in 1937, Earhart disappeared over the central Pacific Ocean near Howland Island. She went missing July 2, 1937, declared dead January 5, 1939. Fascination with her life, career and disappearance continues to this day.


_________________________
SCCF Team
December 7, 2008



**************************************************************




Works Cited



Baker, D. Lee. "Ida B. Wells-Barnett and Her Passion for Justice." Duke University. 5 Dec. 2008.

Bogarad, R. Carley and Schmidt, Z. Jan. Legacies. New York: Harcourt College Publishers, 2002.

"Jane Addams The Nobel Peace Prize 1931." Nobelprize.org. 5 Dec. 2008.

"Maya Angelou." Poets.org from the academy of American poets. 5 Dec. 2008.

"Sojourner Truth (Isabella Baumfree)." Women in History Living vignettes of notable women from U.S. history. 5 Dec. 2008.

Women in History. "Trainer's Toolbox: chapter 1." PA Coalition Against Rape.



 Printable Version

Comments
The comments are owned by the poster. We are not responsible for its content.
great job!!!! agree completely!!
Posted on: 2008-12-05 13:49:25   By: rachelwisen
 
okay, im glad u opened this back up coz its too important! this is excellent!!! its a great way to state the obvious.

they are sexist pigs without conscience! these testosterone driven people are destroying the planet and everything in it! im sick and tired of this stuff!! when will it ever end? thats why women like hillary clinton voted for a disastrous war with no end. she felt pressured to do it coz if she didnt act like a war mongering hawk testosterone they would say shes not strong enuff. she should have stuck with her female intuition. that never fails when we pay attention to it. i hate it when a woman get into powerful positions and try to act like a man. it never works coz they go against their better nature and natural guidance. they should stand up for what they believe in just like you all are doing. you get these female judges becoming a part of the patriarchs and divvying out court orders that put kids and women in danger....sometimes getting them killed!! they adjust to their environment.... some of them were raised by male chauvinist pigs anyway so they dont know any other way to be.....they become henchwomen for their host....act just like the patriarchs....show no humility.....they have no nurturing sense whatsover.

the patriarchs and the rest of the dictator types are always trying to stop progress. but its inevitable! they cant stop the natural process of nature. they were not supposed to be in charge of the entire planet forever! they screwed up! theyve been screwing up with their wars forever! theyve been raping kids forever! theyve been beating up raping women forever! its time to stop this now! women should take their rightful place as leaders of the free world. women are used to the hard work of cleaning up after every damn thing anyway. theyve been doing it since the beginning of time!!


This is powerful, titanic, huge!
Posted on: 2008-12-05 15:00:12   By: dba2010
 
"Do you know why this is a big deal?

It seems children, poor people, women, people of color, whites, gays, straight, and wealthy people have a few things in common. Red liquid flows through their veins; they are the same specie (human beings); they have the ability to love freely; they are born with free will; they have a right to be safe and protected from others perfectly willing to inflict harm; they are capable of creating a better society; they have the capacity to think and create beautiful works of art and masterpieces; even the child specie has a goal to learn how to walk, talk, and eventually be an adult specie.

So why stop there?

If a child learns to walk, talk, follow the rules and then becomes a productive adult specie, is it okay to relegate him or her to that "different" status when he or she says, I'm gay?

So I'm wondering why doesn't the specie embrace commonality rather than exploit perceived differences?"



Terri I would like to be the first on this post to say you are clever, inspirational and wonderful! Thank you for writing something so truthful and honest. I applaud your efforts. The whole team of SCCF is wonderful! It is also very out-of-the-box thinking to connect this issue to the rights children do not currently have in a dysfunctional court system. They do not protect children. They collect a paycheck.....our money! These judges are public servants....we pay them! We pay for their livelihood but they destroy our lives and our children's. It is criminality of catastrophic proportions because it tears down people who are already struggling to survive.

They could kick you in the butt and order psychological evaluations for the entire family just for the heck of it!! They send you to their extremely biased and preferred/chosen psychologists, who gets a giant-sized paycheck from poor folks for his "licensed opinion." If you do not comply with the corrupt judge, you are in contempt of the corrupt court--whether you have the $5,000 or not! You want to protect kids from a psycho parent that you had the misfortune of marrying but if you try to get out of a bad situation and protect your children, the corrupt/classist/sexist/racist court abuses you for leaving. It is a SHAM!

And the psychologist could be someone the judge is sleeping with....they all know each other....they are cut from the same cloth.....the same classism.....they could be golf buddies. It is a good old boys system of corruption that loots families and destroys innocent children's lives.


It needs to die a painful death!!!



Re: This is powerful, titanic, huge!
Posted on: 2008-12-08 17:12:18   By: bobbi
 
I'm happy to be a woman since there's no place left to go but up. I guess being down with the rest of my sisterhood of friends has its perks. This was very knowledgeable and affirming information/stuff. I've been saying on the other post that people need to organize and not just vote in presidential elections. They need to get informed about the local elections too since that's where the pain mostly comes from. I really like the poetic nature of your work, all of you. It's easy to digest this way.

Hey, and Aristotle was an a@#hole!!



Re: This is powerful, titanic, huge!
Posted on: 2008-12-09 14:03:06   By: warren
 
It's good to be back! Hello smart people! You/we took some time off? I wondered when we would get things back on a roll again. I really connected with what George Herbert Mead and de Beauvoir wrote. It all relates to inclusiveness that people don't feel in this society. Mead was trying to point to the fact that people can't maximize on self-actualization if they don't bond to a common cause--a greater cause. I read up on Simone de Beauvoir. She took a lot of hits from males and even some females during her time, but it was mostly males threatened by their power and control status. It never fails. There is always some of these types that were not raised adequately. And females have some blame in that too, even if kids watch their fathers act like orangutans, she can try to teach the kids how to be better people so they don't grow up repeating what they saw their fathers do. I'm not talking about females in domestic abuse situations. I'm talking about the ones who adjust to the comfortable bourgeois lifestyle of their men. de Beauvoir was crucially correct, and so was George Mead. None of these movements for equality ever merged their common interests. They all carry some form of the ingroup and the outgroup issues. If white women could have merged common interests with black women during the women's rights movement, they could have gotten closer to equality. If the gay rights movement would have merged alliances with black women, white women, children's rights, animal rights, immigrant rights, they would have been a bigger force to contend with. They would have larger voting blocks and rallies would have a much more significant impact. Politicians would have to pay close attention or their asses would be out the door. Overall the lessons from de Beauvoir and Mead should be that all oppressed groups should find common ground in their efforts for equality because they are being oppressed in a system that supports patriarchism, sexism, racism, discrimination, child abuse, animal abuse, demagoguery.


Liberals are abusive SOBS too!!
Posted on: 2008-12-09 16:44:58   By: brad
 
Normally I don't ever agree with the people here but this time I have to give credit where credit is due. The French philosopher was not only wise but she was an intellectual prophet. She was telling people about the kind of dominance that corrupts and will continue. My father was an abusive SOB with my mother and my brothers and sisters.....and he was a classic liberal always yelling about social injustice and oppression, yet he was an abusive SOB with my mother and the rest of us. He was as psychotic as any of the people in the nut house except he was clever enough to be a functional psychotic. Nobody outside of our house knew what this guy was capable of. Nobody would believe it. And it wasn't just the threats of being hit that did a number on us it was the psychological abuse from a deranged man. He wasn't usually hitting but he was doing other things to my sisters and brothers that forever messed up their lives.

If anyone of you think a deranged individual can't function on the job, or go out with his buds for a drink, or shoot the sh!t without anybody thinking he's f#@ked up then spot the IGNORANT fool that keeps abusive jerks in charge! I tried not to blame my mother like my siblings did. To this day they still blame her for not taking us away from the nut. I used to blame her too until she finally died from stress, a broken heart, and mental decay. Sometimes I try to convince my siblings that he was a crazy man and she had no place to run since he made her dependent on him and she had no family who gave a damn. What was she going to do, go down to the so-called family court and ask them to help?!!!! That's like an invitation for more mental abuse. That system is as corrupt as it ever was, and it was worse back then. My oldest brother could see my position sometimes but for the most part, I know he blames our mom for not leaving him.....I read somewhere that kids blame the one that is around the most for the abuse of the one who comes and goes.....they target the one close enough to them....the one who is around, the one they see all the time! Now I can see the same thing happening with my brothers and their families. They are abusive jerks too. I can see how my nieces and nephews will end up either abusive or being abusive. They're already abusive with each other so the family cycle of viciousness will continue. Kids learn what the watch and experience in their homes!

If anyone here doubts that abusive jerks can be liberals as well as conservatives then spot another IGNORANT fool. That's why I am moderate politically. I hate extreme jerks on both sides of our so-called democracy!

Pennsylvania's governor Rendell just made an outlandish seriously sexist comment about another governor (when he thought the microphone was off), Janet Napolitano....Obama's pick for secretary of homeland security.....but none of our media bothered to mention it (maybe Keith Olbermann did). If you haven't heard, just Google it....you'll find Rendell's comment and more: "Janet's perfect for the job because for that job, you have to have no life. Janet has no family. Perfect. She can devote, literally, 19, 20 hours a day to it." Sounds like he's jealous as well as sexist to me....maybe he thought Obama was going to keep that job in the chauvinist category and give it to him. It sounds like the governor was saying a woman has a life only if she's doing something "productive" like getting pregnant and having babies. Or it could be that he's saying a woman choosing to have a good career doesn't have a life because she's not in the traditional role of a woman....like married, pregnant, and with some kids. So where's the NOW on this? Why don't your liberals come out and say something about the sexist governor? Could it be because he wears the liberal label? Or could it be that they use him and he uses them so it's a convenient cover/relationship?

I rest my case!






Wow! Brad, you shared a lot!
Posted on: 2008-12-14 18:29:43   By: bobbi
 
I had a different impression of you before you wrote this, based on your other posts. This is quite a revelation you made! I agree with you for the most part. Bush had appointed the former governor of PA, Tom Ridge, head of homeland security so it's quite possible Rendell thought he would be up next for the role. Ridge was a big father's rights advocate. He set policies in place that made it tough for mothers to fight a corrupt court system when protecting their innocent kids. The policies never changed under Rendell for moms, especially, single moms struggling to pay the bills and protect kids from dads who think it's okay to molest their offspring. Sounds bizarre but it's not if you look at how many "indicated" and "found" cases of abuse that happens in Pennsylvania that gets overturned. Prosecutors don't have the adequate training to take on these cases and they end up revictimizing victims of child abuse. It's a screaming shame!! The NMBLA quack psychiatrist that was making a bundle off of his PAS junk science was a welcome addition to the disturbed gentlemen and gentlewomen in government and the court systems.

Brad, do you have children? Or do you plan on having children? I'm asking because you seem like you have a good understanding of your family dynamics and might be able to break the cycle of abuse in your family with your own children.

Thank you for sharing.



Re: Wow! Brad, you shared a lot!
Posted on: 2008-12-14 18:35:20   By: checkmate08
 
I agree Bobbi! Brad surprised me too. He seemed like a far right lunatic on the other posts, but now things seem a lot different. Kudos Brad! You manned up!


Re: Wow! Brad, you shared a lot!
Posted on: 2008-12-14 18:55:50   By: jamie
 
They all seem to have more of a vile reaction to single mothers more than anything else. These sexist jerks are always looking to blame the opposite sex for their impotent failures!! They rape their kids, and these nut-jobs in court think since these guys also have sex with women they couldn't possibly be child molesters!! Check the statistics you NMBLA members masquerading as officials in family court! The dads, step dads, and uncles are usually the ones getting close enough to commit these crimes! You twisted sickos!!




Re: Wow! Brad, you shared a lot!
Posted on: 2008-12-17 15:06:45   By: brad
 
Dear Bobbi,

No. I do not have any children and do not plan on having any. There are enough kids suffering in this world already and I don't plan on adding any more. I have to deal with my own demons before putting kids through the hell I went through as a kid. I'm just not that selfish.




Thank you for doing this!
Posted on: 2008-12-20 00:31:57   By: 4valerieplame
 
This was excellent and very relevant to what's going on in this country right now! Thank you so much for writing this. It needed to be said with this much certainty and positive support for human rights! Thank you all very much!


Kevin Madden on gender inequality? You're kidding, right?! Boys will be boys--left leaning or right!!
Posted on: 2008-12-22 23:08:34   By: doreen1
 
OMG!! They put a bunch of men on CNN to tell us how much women are just bitching for voicing their concerns about Obama's backwards actions of making his top cabinet picks 20:5/men:women. Women are 52% of the population yet they get paid less and have less power than men. AND the women men actually hand-pick, like Condy Rice, end up playing by the patriarchal rules and dominance game. How risk-taking is our programing to treat us all like kids displaying a bunch of right wing or so-called left leaning men telling us women how we're just having that time of the month to point out female inequalities!!!!!!!! And they strategically place female media types to ask the all-male panel questions on whether there's gender equality in Obama's picks! What a joke!!! What the the hell do you expect them to say???!! They'll even go as far as get a black female or any women to say what they want them to say---they already know what their positions will be. It's a sham of the worst kind but these kinds of schemes usually don't work for long. Women are 52% of the population! How long should they be in the boat they are????

Now that Hillary is on Obama's team, you won't hear her supporters like Carville or the other guy saying anything near criticism of Obama like they were before. They've got what they wanted. They were hitting Obama hard before the Hillary pick. That was a good way to silence the dissenting Hillary flocks. The one woman they like don't make for equality!! Good for you Gandy! Speak up about this travesty some more!! Don't let the spin mob drown you out because you are 100% correct. If credible female voices aren't at the decision making table, nothing will ever change. The small number of women on his team will be drowned out for sure!! And some of them may just go along to get along anyway, just like Hillary did with her vote on Iraq! We just don't know if they will stand up to the power. There is more in numbers just like men have been controlling everything for the longest time. We need more females in power too. This is not about Hillary Clinton getting what "she" wants, it's about fairness and equality that's long overdue for all people, especially the most oppressed--women!! They should stop asking a bunch of guys to tell us how we should feel about being slighted by guys....stop trying to pull the wool over our eyes. We're far from stupid! We're 52% of the population strong!!



Re: Kevin Madden on gender inequality? You're kidding, right?! Boys will be boys--left leaning or right!!
Posted on: 2008-12-22 23:24:46   By: bev
 
Doreen, I agree with most of what you wrote, but I re-read Simone de Beauvoir’s writings. What she was saying is that women are just not as united as they need to be. Some go along with the status quo because their husbands keep them in jewelry and riches. They only realize they are part of an oppressed group when their husbands get rid of them for newer and younger wives. For some of these women it comes down to frivolities rather than holding strong positions in our society. We should read up more on women like de Beauvoir and stand stronger together on these oppressive actions against women, children, gays, and lesbians. It’s too entrenched in our system. It’s time for “real” change. Tonight Anderson Cooper asked the right questions on his show. He at least didn’t seem to have prepped his guests all the way like some of the others do. Joe Johns wasn’t talking gender tonight at all. You couldn’t get the same, try as you might on other shows! Johns was basically saying although Rick Warren is sounding different “now” than his website was banning gay people and his comments equating gays with child molesters and incest--the gay community and progressives aren’t completely buying it. And they shouldn’t buy it because nobody with that much antipathy towards a group of people changes that quickly! He must really want the limelight on January 20th. Thank goodness Johns tried on honesty tonight rather than speak like a gender biased male!

Hey, does anybody know what ever happened to the other hypocrite Republican Preacher Ted Haggard caught picking up male prostitutes while doing meth and at the same time condemning gay people???!!! It’s always these extreme types with the most to hide.

Try as you will but it’s hard to find checks and balances in the media on gender inequality issues. We can’t seem to get that from any of the males they put on display to talk about gender inequality and as long as women take a backseat to speaking up about this, that’s exactly how it will stay. And Doreen, you are so right about the particular females they choose to speak on this subject. There’s absolutely no objectivity on this matter because they will say what is expected of them if they want to return to the media spotlight. This is directly related to the lack of protection in our court systems for women suffering from domestic violence and other financial hardships; their children suffering where domestic violence is prevalent; as well as children placed by reckless judges in the care of physically abusive or sexually assaulting parents. With the exception of some groups willing to take the heat to point out these imbalances in our systems, the majority will never do the fair and judicious thing unless people keep their feet to the fire and vote for "real" progressives!



Re: Kevin Madden on gender inequality? You're kidding, right?! Boys will be boys--left leaning or right!!
Posted on: 2008-12-25 13:20:50   By: lunie
 
I love the irony of all of this! Seasons Greetings everyone!


Re: Kevin Madden on gender inequality? You're kidding, right?! Boys will be boys--left leaning or right!!
Posted on: 2008-12-29 16:44:58   By: workedover99x
 

"Men are not prisoners of fate, but only prisoners of their own minds."
- Franklin D. Roosevelt


Men bomb, kill, destroy and do it all over again and again to God's earth and everything in it! It seems like the heavy testosterones types will always be waging war against whomever and whatever they think is weaker than they are.

Monroe County is notorious for corruption. It's not only in Chicago politics and Washington! Just like Dick Cheney becoming vice president then leading America into the Iraqi occupation, then his Halliburton gets big government contracts in Iraq; similar corruption happens in Monroe county with the good old boys getting in as school district board members and then suddenly, miraculously their maintenance companies (private companies) get fat contracts covering all the schools in the district. One of the biggest conflicts of interest happens where you find a lawyer operating as solicitor for the school district also doubling as the go-to-guy/mediator/child custody "decider" in the county. So if a parent has an issue with one of the hand-picked school officials hired by the guys with the multi-million dollar contracts with the school/also school board members, that parent is fresh out of luck when he or, most likely, she, will have to consider which battle to fight with the same guy as lawyer for the school district also operating as the mediator in her child custody case. Corruption begets more corruption! They make a sizable loot off of the government, and at the same time destroying families--at will! These guys are operating like the Nazis! They think they have the absolute right to government and iron-clad control of taxpayers and their kids!

It is statewide corruption Dick Cheney style.



Monroe Corruption!!
Posted on: 2008-12-29 17:45:24   By: gellanu
 
OMG!!! Yes! Yes! This is true what you wrote, Worked-over99! This is just some of the corruption that people have to deal with in Monroe with the good old boys and good old girls acting like good old boys! And you forgot to mention their atrocious policy of sending off their perceived poor, undesirable, minority kids to alternative schools so that they can make their quota numbers for federal money with the teach to the test teachers! They purposely provoke the kids they know will react to them and then off these poor kids will go without a second thought to these horrible side-schools-of-ruin! They put one of the worst "I'm so high society" judges in charge of sending these kids off to the no-man's land schools, and the wicked witch that she is never disappoints! What a vicious woman that Maggie Worthington!! Even the local media knows about her. You don't even have to tell them which judge did what when they come around looking for a news story at the court. They know without anyone telling them her name! They have their own name for her!



The news they don't like talking about!!
Posted on: 2009-01-02 23:50:35   By: bev
  Edited By: bev
On: 2009-01-05 23:35:11
Doreen, gellanu & workedover99x, did you all catch the piece on the Anderson Cooper show tonight with the 28 year old woman who got herself on tape trying to hire a hit man to kill her ex and his wife? They say it was due to a child custody case. I always find it interesting how they show these pieces sometimes without the normal psychological explanation like they do when they show males "actually" committing bloody, murderous crimes. They displayed the so-called expert mental health people with the Santa killer who shot the little girl in her face when she opened the door to face the bloodiness that followed with the psycho killing nine of her family members! Don Lemon had a woman on saying how depressed the guy was. Uh, huh, I guess that means everybody could dress as Santa and go out on a killing spree b/c most of the U.S. is depressed or about to be in this dreadful economy! A media woman was on and saying how the Santa killer's brother said he was acting depressed. The only woman they brought in who gave any different opinion was a criminal profiler who was saying being depressed is not an answer for why this guy premeditated the planning and deaths of his ex-wife's family. He planned his escape afterward except his Santa Claus suit caught on fire and he ended up shooting himself rather than go to jail and face the consequences, which is what these psychotic cowards tend to do sometimes. So they showed the 28 year old woman planning her ex's death without a quack psychologist on to explain it away but they do the opposite with the guy who premeditates the death of nine people, including the brutality of shooting a little nine-year-old girl in the face on immediate impact! How slanted and biased is our media with this stuff anyway?!! And how stupid they must think some of us are to try to pull this stuff off right before our eyes!! What won't they do to keep the patriarchal dominance going?!! It's not like it's in jeopardy of ever changing any time soon anyway, so why so much effort to keep the status quo of women in the assumed oppressed position??!!

It's not like women are the ones strapping on weapons of mass destruction via heavy duty assault rifles to their bodies and murdering kids in schools or committing the most heinous crimes wiping out multiple human beings! Even the stupid woman trying to hire that cop as hit man was too chicken to do it herself. What these patriarchal folks in the media and elsewhere where dominance is the name of the game refuse to deal with or actually talk about is the fact that society tells males that aggression and violence are the necessary tools to accomplish what they want. Everything about the typical toys for boys say violence. Slasher films, most action films, you name it, all glorify and push violence as the thing to do. When they spoof and telecast single incident over and over again with one ignorant, stupid, and probably mentally unhealthy woman trying to hire someone to kill her ex, they distort actual facts about the violence that women and children live with every single day!! We should be asking why they don't show the governmental reports on children going missing every 40 seconds....every 40 seconds a child goes missing, folks!!! We don't hear too much about that! We don't hear the statistics of the beatings that happen routinely in domestic violence: "Statistics have suggested violence is perpetrated against women in almost half of all marriages. Statistics gathered from 1994 indicate domestic violence causes almost 100,000 days of hospitalization, 30,000 emergency room visits, 40,000 trips to the doctor every year, and 50% of all homeless women and their children are fleeing domestic violence. In the US, male partners beat almost 4 million women every year." And that was stats from 1994. Recent stats has these numbers much higher!!

They like to point to alcohol as one of the reasons men beat up women but most mental health people say alcohol is not the cause of domestic violence against women. It just makes men freer, more uninhibited to do what they wanted to do--dominate and beat on the weaker, and usually without the indiscriminate fact that their kids are witnesses--a lot of times the kids are beaten too, and if they aren't beaten physically, they are beaten in other ways mentally and psychologically as witnesses to the abuse and beat down of their mothers!!

When will our media address the violence in society in a meaningful way rather than show snippets of single-sided incidents that don't address the catastrophic violence that males commit every day? It's a deadly shame!




Re: The news they don't like talking about!!
Posted on: 2009-01-03 00:02:13   By: doreen1
 

Bev, the stats definitely changed since 1994. I guess that's what happens when years pass and nothing changes. I found this on this website: http://www.wcstx.com/domsticv.htm


Facts About Domestic Violence:

FBI statistics indicate that every 12 seconds a woman is beaten by her husband, boyfriend, or lover.

Battering happens to women of every culture, age, color, nationality and educational socio-economic level.

* Of the children who witness domestic violence, 60% of the boys eventually become batterers, and 50% of the girls become victims.

* Police officers spend at least 1/3 of their time responding to domestic violence calls.

* 64% of all women will be battered at some time in their lives.

* 60% of battered women are beaten while they are pregnant.

* 95% of all spousal assaults are committed by men.

* 81% of men who batter had fathers who abused their mothers.

* Children raised in violent homes are 74% more likely to commit assault.

* 6 million American women are beaten each year by their husbands or boyfriends. 4,000 of them are killed.

* 52% of female murder victims are killed by their partners.

* Battering is the single major cause of injury to women -- more frequent than auto accidents, muggings, and rapes combined. It is the leading cause of emergency room visits by women.

* 1 in 4 female suicides were victims of family violence.

* Nine women in the U.S. Virgin Islands have died as a result of domestic violence since 1994.


If you are in a relationship, the following are considered possible predictors of domestic violence.

Jealousy: An abuser says jealousy is a sign of love. It is a sign of possessiveness and lack of trust. He/she may not be just jealous of you, but also of your relationships with your girlfriends. He may want you with him all the time, even when it's inconvenient.

Controlling Behavior: The may try to lay down the law on what you can and cannot do. He/she monopolizes your time, who you talk to or may not allow you to make decisions about your clothes,finances, home, etc.

Violent Behavior: If an abuser gets into fights at parties, on the street, or in bars it is highly probable that he will carry that behavior home with him.

Verbal Abuse: Saying things or calling you names that are meant to be cruel and hurtful. Degrading and putting you down will lower your self-esteem and self-confidence.

Quick Involvement: An abuser will pressure you into a committed relationship early on. Many victims dated or knew their abusers less than six months before getting married or moving in together.

Mood Swings: One minute he/she is nice and the next he's/she's exploding. Explosiveness and moodiness are typical of people who beat their partners.

Isolation: You no longer keep in contact with your friends, parents, or neighbors. Criticizes and does not like any of them. You don't say hello to people for fear that your partner will get jealous and angry.

Blaming: An abuser will blame others for his/her problems, especially the partner. He/she may shift responsibility for his violence onto others, taking refuge in excuses like "If you shaped up, I wouldn't have to knock you around."

Breaking or Striking Objects: This behavior is used as a punishment or to terrorize into submission.

Unrealistic Expectations: Abusers can be overly critical. They may expect their partners to meet all their needs. He/she expects you to be the perfect spouse, lover, and friend.

Hypersensitivity: An abuser is easily insulted or hurt, and takes the slightest setbacks as personal attacks.

Frustration and Anger: An abuser may have trouble handling their frustration and anger.

Family History: Abusers often have been raised in abusive surroundings. They may have seen their mother beaten or have been abused themselves. They have grown up believing that violence is "normal behavior."

Past Battering: Abusers may have hit lovers in the past and may excuse themselves by saying "he/she made me do it".

Attitude Toward Women: An abuser may have strong traditional ideas about what a man should be and what a woman should be. He may think that a woman should stay at home, take care of her husband and follow his wishes and orders.

Economic Control: An abuser may refuse to allow you to work or have access to bank accounts and financial information.

Cruelty To Animals Or Children: This person punishes animals brutally or is insensitive to their pain or suffering; he/she may expect children to be capable of doing things beyond their ability.

Alcohol Or Drug Abuse: Such problems don't cause battering, but they invariably make it worse. Don't think you can change your partner. A chemical dependence is bigger than both of you.

Threats Of Violence: This could include any threat of physical force meant to control the partner, including the threat of suicide.




Re: The news they don't like talking about!!
Posted on: 2009-01-03 00:54:15   By: bev
 

Hey Doreen, I read on another site that it's every 9 seconds that a woman is beaten in a domestic violence situation. 9 or 12 seconds, still pretty horrifying stats. We know they cultivate and slant news reporting but they can't cultivate and slant the reports from actual hospitals where the women are showing up busted up from head to toe or the autopsy reports from the morgues.

This idea is interesting at this site: http://www.mvwcs.com/powerfulword.html


Domestic Violence
Words Are Powerful


The following are examples of ways to rephrase victim-blaming language:


IT'S THE BATTERER IT'S THE BATTERER IT'S THE BATTERER


She provoked him.
NO, THE FACT IS He made a choice.

Family violence, violent relationship.
NO, IT'S Abuser, violent person.

Why does she stay?
NO, THE QUESTION IS Why does he batter?

She is a battered woman.
NO, THE FACT IS He is an abuser.

He has an anger control issue.
NO, THE FACT IS He uses abuse to have power and control over his partner.


IT'S THE BATTERER IT'S THE BATTERER IT'S THE BATTERER


How to explain to a child
* What is Domestic Violence?
* What is Sexual Assault?

Go to this website:
http://www.mvwcs.com/children/index.html



Re: The news they don't like talking about!!
Posted on: 2009-01-06 00:02:02   By: doreen1
 
Great way to express how powerful these labels are in society, Bev. Excellent! I just heard more sickening details on testosterone violence with that guy who got an Amber Alert out for his 2-year-old son and then confessed to the cops that he killed him so that he wouldn't have to continue to pay child support. That's really what's behind some of these Fathers' Rights guys spending their lobbyist dollars with our government! They get so angry when a woman decides to leave their abusive asses and then they get politics involved since they know patriarchal dominance rules there too and is on their side. The guy had the nerve to say he's so sorry for the pain he caused while being led away in handcuffs. Too bad he couldn't think about how sorry he would be while killing his son and watching the kid die. Too bad money meant more to him than his own child!!! At least he didn't kill the mother while she was still pregnant with the boy like Scott Peterson, the murdering bastard! Or murder his ex-wife out of testosterone-filled rage like O.J. Simpson. Or kill his pregnant girlfriend with his 2-year-old son watching, and then bury her body and join a bunch of people to search for her like that cop, Bobby Cutts. Or get away with the murder of your wife by saying she drowned in a damn bathtub(?!!) and then oops, another wife goes missing, while planning to marry your fifth wife like Drew "Murderer" Peterson!! It's a crying shame!

As for those females dominated by the crazys telling them to strap on some bombs to their bodies so that they can be greeted as martyrs just like the male suicide bombers, we can see how much patriarchal dominance lives all over the world. This new female bombing phenomena must end! This is one of the most heinous things in recent times. It's bad enough that women suffer so much in this patriarchal society but now they think they have to prove their loyalty to their oppressors by killing themselves along with innocent civilians. This brainwashing of women is too painful to comprehend let alone happening in the 21st friggin century!!

Enough is enough!!! Since the patriarchs want to kill themselves they should go off like real men and do it far away from human population. They are far from human, including the brainwashed women who think and act just like them!!




Re: Monroe Corruption!!
Posted on: 2009-01-06 23:22:14   By: dottie
 
Workedover99x and Gellanu, sometimes gender becomes such an issue that women in power will just decide it's easier to be wicked and adjust(like that saying when in Rome do as the Romans) than care about victims. In all fairness, some females were raised without the sense of motherhood or nurturing!

"Be less curious about people and more curious about ideas."
-Marie Curie

I heard there's a worse female judge in Monroe County than Maggie Worthington (some people believe Worthington is finally starting to get it). If the media has a name for Worthington, they definitely have one for Judge Linda Miller, or they soon will! She's the only other female judge on the bench amongst the nine (just two of them) and she's absolutely horrendous and treats women with complete disdain! Abused women could prove their case against their abusive exs or partners all they want....they could even show the bloodied pictures or stand dripping with blood before Miller and it won't matter. She's completely jaded by the system. She's been there as long as the head of the clan president judge. And she's the only "Democrat" there!!! So much for liberals supposedly caring more about the suffering people!!! She hates victims' support people. She orders them out of her court. She leaves victims of domestic and sexual abuse worse off than they were when they came in her court looking for help. By far, she's worse than Maggie Worthington!! It's for sure she caused women to be more abused and killed by her actions. Judge Miller has the worse reputation when it comes to women and allowing them protective court orders (which does nothing anyway. A woman was murdered in front of her kid by her husband right near my house, and she had a PFA...protective court order). There's no other word for her. If Judge Worthington is a witch, Judge Miller is just a complete, heartless BITCH!!! She's had that tax-payer job way too long!!!



Re: Monroe Corruption!!
Posted on: 2009-01-08 16:37:18   By: 4kindred
 
Dottie, I agree with you about how some women were raised/groomed. It's possible that these high society judges, corrupt ones, and other types who don't have any humanity, have a huge chemical/hormonal imbalance that causes them to act more like the super aggressive, arrogant, testosterone, bully type. Maybe they have more male genetics. I'm starting to really believe this.


Let us "hope" that it is really a new day!!
Posted on: 2009-01-20 19:52:43   By: atre
 
This is a historic day, people! Happy 1/20/09!!! Let's keep hoping for better days ahead!


Re: Let us "hope" that it is really a new day!!
Posted on: 2009-01-20 21:29:49   By: buzz
 
It's a great new day!! I still have too much hope! Goodbye, BUSH!!!!!!!


Re: Let us "hope" that it is really a new day!!
Posted on: 2009-01-20 21:32:16   By: allyhoop
 
Hip, hip, hooray! Goodbye, Bush-wrecker!! Nah, nah, nah, nah, nah, nah, nah, nah, hey, hey, hey, GOODBYE!!


Re: Let us "hope" that it is really a new day!!
Posted on: 2009-01-20 21:42:33   By: brownieincompetence
 
Africans were forced into slavery and taken against their will from their homeland to America--now an American with African and Caucasian blood lives in the White House. America, you are a remarkable LADY! Happy January 20, 2009!


"2 Pa. judges to plead guilty to public corruption"
Posted on: 2009-01-27 19:01:21   By: gellanu
 
Check this out everybody!!

The Times Leader ran this story today at this link:
http://www.timesleader.com/news/ap?articleID=1522532


A lawyer for a judge accused of a kickback scheme says a plea agreement announced by prosecutors could fall apart.

Al Flora represents Luzerne County President Judge Mark Ciavarella (shiv-ah-REL'-lah). He told a Wilkes-Barre newspaper, The Citizens' Voice, that the plea agreements require the defendants to accept the facts to be presented by prosecutors at a plea hearing. He says the hearing hasn't been scheduled yet.

Ciavarella is charged along with Senior Judge Michael Conahan (CON'-ah-han). Prosecutors say they got $2.6 million in kickbacks in return for placing juvenile offenders into certain detention facilities.

They have agreed to plead guilty to honest services fraud and tax fraud. Conahan's lawyer, Philip Gelso, declined comment.



"Feds: Judges used system to enrich selves"
Posted on: 2009-01-27 19:13:07   By: workedover99x
 
Gellanu, you can bet they were doing this to mostly poor kids. Just another day at the expense of poor people! I found some more details on the story about the judges:


"Feds: Judges used system to enrich selves"


Feds: Judges used system to enrich selves
Allegations are that Ciavarella, Conahan took $2.6M in kickbacks in exchange for judicial rulings regarding detention centers.

By Terrie Morgan-Besecker tmorgan@timesleader.com
Law & Order Reporter

SCRANTON – For more than a decade, Mark Ciavarella and Michael Conahan served on the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas, developing reputations as hard-working judges.

On Monday, federal prosecutors revealed the longtime jurists were allegedly working equally hard behind the scenes on a far less noble endeavor – enriching themselves at the expense of the public and juveniles who appeared in Luzerne County Court.

They did so in the form of kickbacks -- $2.6 million worth – that U.S. Attorney Martin Carlson said were paid to the judges by two unnamed people in exchange for favorable judicial rulings regarding the PA Child Care juvenile detention center in Pittston Township, and its sister facility, Western PA Child Care in Butler County.“This is a sad event when individuals who took an oath violate that oath and violate the law,” Carlson said at a Monday afternoon press conference at the federal courthouse where he announced charges of conspiring to defraud the IRS and devising a scheme to defraud taxpayers of their honest services had been filed against the jurists.

Carlson said Ciavarella, 58, and Conahan, 56, have signed plea agreements that call for them to serve 87 months in prison and to pay a yet-to-be-determined amount of restitution.

The judges have also agreed to resign from office within 10 days after the court accepts their pleas, and will immediately be disbarred from practicing law. Ciavarella resigned as president judge on Friday.

The maximum combined penalty for the two offenses was 25 years in prison and up to $500,000 in fines. Carlson said he believed the plea deal that was worked out serves justice.

The charges stem from a more than two-year investigation by the FBI and IRS that uncovered a “flagrant violation of public trust,” said Leslie DeMarco, special agent in charge of the IRS criminal investigation unit.

“They sold their oath of office to the highest bidders and engaged in an ongoing scheme to defraud the public,” Deron Roberts, chief of the FBI’s Scranton office, said at the news conference.

The 22-page complaint details an elaborate scheme the judges developed to ensure PA Child Care, then owned by Butler Township attorney Robert Powell and Gregory Zappala, prospered financially. Gregory Zappala is the son of former Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice Stephen A. Zappala.

According to the complaint:

Conahan removed funding for the county-operated juvenile center on River Street in Wilkes-Barre in 2002, ensuring its closure. The county began sending youths to PA Child Care when it opened in February 2003.

Just prior to its opening, Conahan signed a “placement guarantee agreement” with the facility that guaranteed the courts would pay an annual rental installment of $1.3 million.

Ciavarella, the county’s longtime juvenile court judge, helped ensure PA Child Care had a high occupancy rate by, at times, ordering children be detained there even when the juvenile probation department felt it was not necessary.

Ciavarella did that in part by establishing a “specialty court” that created a potential for an increased number of juveniles to be sent to PA Child Care.

The judges’ actions assisted the two juvenile centers in securing agreements with Luzerne County that were worth “tens of million of dollars” for the placement of juvenile offenders, the complaint says.

The complaint also describes how two others involved in the scheme – identified as “participant 1” and “participant 2” – funneled money to the judges by disguising the payments as a “broker fee” or as falsely portraying them as rental payments for a Florida condominium.

Carlson would not identify the two participants, but details contained in the complaint indirectly identify them as Powell and Robert Mericle of Mericle Construction, the contractor who built both the PA Child Care and Western PA Child Care facilities.

The complaint notes that in June 2000, Ciavarella had a conversation with a Luzerne County attorney “who was interested in constructing a juvenile detention facility” in the county. Ciavarella then introduced that person to a contractor, a friend of Ciavarella who was later hired by that attorney to build the center.

The complaint also notes several transfers of funds that were made by Mericle Construction and Vision Holdings, a company owned by Powell, that prosecutors contend were made to conceal payments to Conahan and Ciavarella.

No charges have been filed against Mericle, Powell or Zappala. Asked if any more charges were forthcoming, Carlson would only say the investigation is continuing.

Powell could not be reached for comment Monday. In prepared statements, Mericle and Zappala, who bought out Powell’s interest in the centers last June, denied any criminal activity.

“At no time did Robert Mericle or Mericle Construction ever make any payment to influence a decision to secure a contract to build any PA Child Care facility,” said Lew Sebia, general counsel for Mericle Construction. “Mr. Mericle has cooperated with authorities with respect to this investigation and will continue to do so in the future without exception.”

William Brucker, attorney for PA Child Care, said Zappala did not have “any knowledge whatsoever of the actions” described in the complaint.

“I can confirm only that no charges have been brought against the companies or its principal owner, Gregory Zappala, and that none are anticipated,” Brucker said.

Ciavarella’s attorney, Al Flora, of Wilkes-Barre, said Ciavarella and Conahan also dispute some of the allegations contained in the complaint.

“The information you have before you constitutes the government’s allegations. It is not an admission to all those allegations,” Flora said.

Flora explained the plea agreement is a “conditional plea.” The precise facts that Ciavarella and Conahan will admit to will not be known until they actually appear before a judge to enter their pleas, Flora said. No date has been set for that hearing.

At the time the judges appear in court, the U.S. Attorney’s Office will have to recite evidence in support of the various allegations, Flora said. Ciavarella and Conahan would then have to decide whether to admit to those particular facts, he said.

Flora said Ciavarella will not admit to all of the information included in the complaint. If the government presents facts in support of each of those allegations, Ciavarella will not agree to enter the plea, he said.

“I can tell you, Judge Ciavarella will not admit to every one of those allegations,” Flora said.

Flora said he is also speaking on behalf of Conahan, who is represented by attorney Philip Gelso. He said he believes Conahan also will not admit to all of the allegations contained in the complaint.

It was not clear Monday whether the case will be heard by a judge sitting in Scranton, or be transferred to a jurist within another section of the Middle District, such as Harrisburg or Williamsport. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Gordon Zubrod.

Conahan and Ciavarella will remain free pending their court appearances. Asked why the judges were not immediately taken into custody, Carlson said it is standard procedure to allow anyone charged with a “white-collar crime” such as this to remain free until they are summoned to enter the plea in court. He stressed that all proceedings involving the judges will be public.

“While some might wish for a moment of high drama, that sort of perp walk … justice requires us to deal with these defendants like we would every other defendant in a similar situation,” he said.

Stressing the investigation is continuing, Carlson called upon anyone who may have further knowledge relating to the case to contact the FBI or IRS.



Re: "Feds: Judges used system to enrich selves"
Posted on: 2009-01-27 21:21:26   By: 4kindred
 
Bastard, CROOKED SOBs!! They hide their shame under judicial robes and act like the law they are supposed to represent doesn't apply to them! BASTARDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Re: "Feds: Judges used system to enrich selves"
Posted on: 2009-01-27 21:27:00   By: warren
 
The law doesn't apply to them. They don't even get anywhere near the kind of punishment they give to the people coming before them. They dish it out without worry or impunity because they know they will never suffer the way they make the poor suffer.


Re: "Feds: Judges used system to enrich selves"
Posted on: 2009-01-27 21:31:43   By: dba2010
 
Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.


Re: "Feds: Judges used system to enrich selves"
Posted on: 2009-01-29 11:09:28   By: checkmate08
 
WOW!!!! I can't say what surprises me more, the fact that these judges got caught or that somebody finally went after their assess!! Just goes to show, you can fool some people some of the time, but sometimes your sorry ass finally get what you deserve!!


Killer getting married AGAIN!!!
Posted on: 2009-02-14 12:28:29   By: bobbi
 
He's getting married AGAIN!!! The young woman needs HELP!!! Somebody needs to STOP THIS!!! They need to lock this man up right away!!

Woman Killer, Drew Peterson Getting Married AGAIN!!!!!


Re: Killer getting married AGAIN!!!
Posted on: 2009-02-16 00:19:49   By: doreen1
 
That guy is funny on that link but that girl with the killer cop is NOT funny at all!!! What the hell is happening with this woman???!!! She must be out of her mind! He's going to kill her too. If you heard them in that interview she sounds like she could get under his skin easily and then he'll bury that body too.


Re: Killer getting married AGAIN!!!
Posted on: 2009-02-20 23:47:43   By: gellanu
 
Doreen, you're so right! He's going to kill her too. He's a sociopath. He gets off on being the killer nobody can stop. He probably won't drown this one in the bathtub. He'll claim she took a hard fall and died while decorating the Christmas tree. No joke! This guy is a real psycho=sicko!


Re: "Feds: Judges used system to enrich selves"
Posted on: 2009-02-20 23:34:34   By: gellanu
 
Hello everyone! Here's an update on the crooked PA judges that sent kids to juvenile centers for kickbacks: Amy Goodman: How Two Former PA Judges Got Millions in Kickbacks to Send Juveniles to Private Prisons

The judges even jailed some of the young people over the objections of their probation officers.


About Rihanna....
Posted on: 2009-02-25 16:22:42   By: bev
 
I think it's shameful what happened to Rihanna. What's just as shameful is all the people speculating about this case accusing her of all sorts of things. Even females are blaming her. If Chris wasn't cute, would they say the same thing?! She was the one who ended up in the hospital with bite marks and big hard knots in her head yet they come to the rescue of the accused. I want this nonsense to stop! She didn't deserve the beating no matter what happened. It's not her fault so STOP BLAMING AND HATING!


Re: About Rihanna....
Posted on: 2009-02-26 18:45:05   By: doreen1
 
Thanks for raising this issue, Bev. These various groups must keep talking about violence against women and not just when a celebrity gets injured. Plenty of girls and women are hurt everyday. This subject should be out there more often than it is. Thank goodness we have this website to speak our minds whenever we want to!


Re: About Rihanna....
Posted on: 2009-02-27 14:33:13   By: jamie
 
Bev I feel the same way. They should deal with the real issue here, which is domestic violence against women. He's not too cute to be arrested or beat up his girlfriend.


Re: About Rihanna....
Posted on: 2009-03-13 15:38:09   By: jamie
 
They should start talking around this subject. It happens every day to women and girls. This makes me mad that suddenly a celebrity gets hit and now they all want to talk about it. Look at the statistics! It's a serious epidemic every day for women and girls!! And she's not a role model! If that was true then the message to young girls is it's okay to get hit! It's not okay!! Her handlers should think about her for a change. Even if she wants to go back, she's not safe and they will be out of a job if he kills her one day. If they want to save Chris Brown's career by sacrificing Rihanna then shame on them...all of them!!!!





Safe Child Custody Fund
All Rights Reserved ©2006-2009


Another Design by Lynxx Direct Inc.